04Precision ceramics

Cheap to fire,
expensive to finish.

Alumina plates, zirconia rings, SiC nozzles and machinable glass-ceramic fixtures. The pressing is the cheap half — the diamond grinding is where the tolerance, the price and the yield are actually decided.

01Materials

Pick the material before the tolerance

Ceramics are not interchangeable, and the wrong choice cannot be machined back. Alumina for cost and insulation, zirconia for toughness, SiC for wear and thermal shock, AlN when heat has to leave — and machinable glass-ceramic when you need three prototypes this week.

Table 1 · Technical ceramic properties, typical values

Material Density g/cm³ Hardness HV Flexural MPa KIC MPa·m½ CTE 10⁻⁶/K k W/m·K Max use °C, air
Alumina 99.5% Al₂O₃ 3.90 1,600 360 4.0 7.2 30 1,650
Alumina 96% cost grade 3.70 1,600 300 3.5 6.5 25 1,600
Zirconia 3Y-TZP ZrO₂ 6.05 1,250 1,000 8.0 10.0 2.5 1,000
ZTA alumina-toughened 4.20 1,450 600 6.0 8.0 22 1,500
Silicon nitride Si₃N₄ 3.20 1,500 800 6.5 3.1 25 1,200
Silicon carbide SSiC 3.10 2,400 450 4.0 4.0 120 1,600
Aluminium nitride AlN 3.30 1,150 350 3.0 4.6 180 1,000
Machinable glass-ceramic Macor-type 2.52 250 100 1.5 9.3 1.6 800

Scroll the table sideways for all columns →

Why AlN is the exception. Its thermal conductivity is roughly six times alumina's — the reason it appears in LED bases, RF packages and heat spreaders. It is also brittle (KIC ~3) and expensive to grind, so it is specified only when the heat path is the problem.

02Tolerances

Shrinkage, then grinding

A ceramic part leaves the kiln 15–20% smaller than the mould and nowhere near final tolerance. Everything after that is diamond. The three columns below are three different processes, not three quality levels.

Table 2 · Achievable tolerance by process stage

Attribute As sintered net shape Diamond ground standard Lapped / polished precision
Dimensional tolerance ±0.5% or ±0.2 mm ±0.010 mm ±0.005 mm
Flatness 0.05 mm 0.005 mm 0.001 mm
Parallelism 0.10 mm 0.010 mm 0.003 mm
Surface roughness Ra 1.5–3 µm 0.4 µm 0.1 → 0.02 µm
Hole tolerance ±0.2 mm ±0.020 mm ±0.010 mm
Minimum wall 1.5 mm 0.5 mm 0.3 mm
Edge chipping ≤0.5 mm ≤0.2 mm ≤0.05 mm
Typical use Furnace furniture, spacers Fixtures, seals, nozzles Wafer contact, metrology, sealing faces

Scroll the table sideways for all columns →

Grinding cost is not linear in tolerance. Going from ±0.05 mm to ±0.010 mm is a modest step; going from ±0.010 to ±0.005 roughly doubles the time again, because it usually means a second fixturing and a lapping operation. That is worth knowing before the drawing is frozen.

03Written into the order

Three lines a ceramic quotation usually omits

Because the material is cheap and the machining is not, most of the risk sits in three places that a one-line price never mentions.

Body01

Grade and density

“99% alumina” is a purity claim, not a property. Density and flexural strength are what you actually design against — and they vary between one powder supplier and the next.

Purity
named, with lot
Density
≥99% theoretical
Flexural
reported, MPa
Colour
as-fired, no dye
Geometry02

Datums and flatness

A flatness callout without a datum is unmeasurable on a flexible thin plate. On ceramics thinner than 2 mm, how the part is supported during measurement changes the reading.

Datum
named face
Flatness
with support method
Thickness
±0.01 mm typical
Edge
chamfer or radius
Inspection03

Chipping, not just size

Ceramic fails at edges. A part that measures perfectly and chips at the seal face leaks — so the acceptance number for edge damage belongs in the PO.

Edge chips
≤0.2 mm, counted
Cracks
none permitted
Ra
on the functional face
Report
CMM + photo

04Qualification

How we qualify a ceramic shop

A ceramic workshop can be excellent at pressing and mediocre at grinding, or the reverse. The checks below separate the two, because the price you are quoted is almost always driven by the second.

01

Which half do they own

Pressing, sintering and grinding in one plant — or pressing here and grinding subcontracted. Both models work; the second needs a named grinding shop and a tolerance conversation before quoting.

02

Density on the lot

Archimedes density per batch, not a datasheet figure. Under-sintered bodies machine beautifully and fail in service, and the only early signal is density a few percent low.

03

How flatness is measured

On a surface plate, on three points, or on a CMM with a defined support. For thin plates the three answers differ — so the method must be written down, not assumed.

04

Edge quality under magnification

Chipping is judged at 10–20×, photographed, and counted against the PO number. “Small chips acceptable” is how a seal face becomes a leak two months later.

05

Diamond wheel and dressing discipline

A worn wheel burns the surface and pulls grains; the part measures right and the Ra is wrong. We look at wheel logs on the machines running our parts.

06

First article before volume

Three parts, full CMM report, sectioned if the geometry is internal. Cheaper than discovering a shrinkage error after a thousand pieces are pressed.

05Where it goes wrong

Three failures we see most often

Trap 01

Purity quoted, density not

“99.7% alumina” sounds precise and tells you almost nothing about strength. Two bodies of the same purity can differ by 30% in flexural strength depending on grain size and sintering aids.

Trap 02

Flatness on an unsupported plate

A 0.5 mm alumina plate measured flat on a granite block and measured flat in free air are different parts. If the drawing does not say how, the supplier will choose the method that passes.

Trap 03

Machinable ceramic used as a production material

Glass-ceramic is superb for prototypes and vacuum fixtures, and wrong for wear parts: hardness is a fraction of alumina's and it generates dust. Cheap in ones, expensive in thousands.

Send the drawing, and say what it has to survive.

Wear, heat, HF, 1,600 °C, or a seal that must not leak — the duty decides the body, and the body decides the price. We will come back with both, and with the grinding route written down.